Friday, December 7, 2007

Does my company really need an Employee Handbook?

If you have more than 15 employees, it is careless if you don't have one. Fifteen employees is the threshhold concerning liability regarding discrimination claims. Other benchmarks include 20 employees for age discrimination, 50 employees for Family Medical Leave, and 100 employees under the WARN act.

An employee manual can create many advantages in litigating employment discrimination claims because in the handbook you can clearly ask employees to contact the appropriate individual before a claim is permitted to be litigated. In other words, an employee handbook, if properly constructed can give you additional save guards. These safe guards have been clearly delineated in a Supreme Court Ruling called the Farragher defense, which states that employees normally must give employers an opportunity to cure the discrimination they are experiencing.

Additionally, an employee handbook is a simple way of communicating an employer’s expectations and requirements to employees. While it is best to combine the delivery of the handbook with an oral discussion of key policies, the handbook’s collection of written policies provides employees with a place to go when they have questions. Moreover, employee morale is positively influenced when there is prior notice of what is required and even-handed application of those requirements. It is the presence of written rules and consistent application of them that can help employers prevail on such claims deriving from FMLA, Unemployment Compensation, and Discrimination.

Although in Florida, an employee handbook is not a contract, Courts, and more specifically, Jurors, will generally require the employer to follow its own policies and procedures. As such, don't make policies and procedures you do not intend to follow. Explain to the employee that their job is an "at will job" and make sure you require employees to acknowledge in writing that they have received a copy of the handbook.

In any event, before finalizing your employee handbook, you should have it reviewed by an Employment Law Attorney.

Tuesday, December 4, 2007

What Constitutes an Adverse Employment Action?

So, your employer is discriminating against you? Well, to be legally actionable, your employer must take an action against you that is tangible. Granted, tangible means many things to different people. Even Judges across the United States have had many different opinions on what a tangible adverse employment action means. Some Judges have ruled that a tangible employment action included such things as termination or demotion (i.e., actions that affected the employee's benefits). Other Judges have defined it more liberally and concluded that an adverse employment action is any action that targets an employee and creates any disparate treatment. In a landmark June 2006 decision, the Supreme Court in White v. Burlington defined an adverse employment action as any action by the employer that would dissuade a reasonable employee from having asserted a right. This means that any action that is taken by an employer towards an employee may be construed as a legally adverse employment action if it is reasonable to construe it as such (i.e., change in schedule, change in assignments). The end result is that more of these cases will be going to a Jury. This case was definitely a win for employees.

Who is responsible for my FMLA rights if my employer uses a staffing company?

The short answer is that your primary employer is responsible for your FMLA rights and the secondary employer is simply not allowed to interfere with your rights.

The Courts use different criteria for ascertaining who is your primary or secondary employer. Normally, for purposes of the FMLA, the primary employer is the staffing agency. Astonishingly enough, however, for FLSA purposes, i.e. overtime, the primary employer is the company that the employee provides services for, and not the staffing agency. This is particularly surprising because the FMLA was modeled after the FLSA. However, there is the Code of Federal Regulation that trumps this general rule: 29 C.F.R. 805.106 states that only the primary employer is responsible for providing FMLA leave and that normally the primary employer is the staffing agency.

Hence, if you are owed overtime, go after the employer you provide services for. If your FMLA rights have been breached, go after the staffing agency.