Showing posts with label law firm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label law firm. Show all posts

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Driving with License Suspended or Revoked (video)

Attorney Dedra Sibley discusses the criminal law issue of Driving with License Suspended or Revoked.



Thursday, September 11, 2008

Explanation of Felony and Misdemeanor Charge (video)

Attorney Dedra Sibley explains the difference between a felony and misdemeanor charge, a criminal law issue.



Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Can a child support order be modified?

The law recognizes that an individual’s circumstances may change following a divorce. As such, so too may the circumstances as to the payment and amount of payment of child support as the needs of the child may change as they grow older. Florida law has adopted statutory guidelines regarding the amount of child support a non-residential parent must pay a residential parent. These guidelines are utilized in determining child support by following a straightforward procedure based upon specific calculations relating to the respective incomes of the parents.

Child support must be paid as long as the child is a minor or continues to be either mentally or physically dependent. The failure of a non-residential parent to pay their child support obligations can be quite severe, for example, loss of their state issued driver’s licenses, non-dischargeability in bankruptcy, IRS tax refunds can be intercepted or potential arrest. Though what is important to know is that child support orders can be modified, either upwards or downwards, upon providing proof to the court of any substantial change in circumstances affecting the supported child's welfare or the non-residential parent's ability to pay. Section 61.14(1) (a) (1), F. S. states that “either party may apply” for modification of child support. In addition, under Section 61.14(2)(a)-(k), F. S, the court takes into consideration a series of factors in making its determination to reduce or even terminate a child support order.

By Gina Silvestri, Esq.

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

What Constitutes Sexual Harassment?

There is no hard rule that Courts use to determine what constitutes Sexual Harassment; however, Courts use certain guidelines as well as use a totality of the circumstance test. Generally speaking, the conduct/harassment needs to be more than merely insulting or rude and boorish behavior. The anti-Sexual Harassment laws are not intended to be “general civility codes.” The required standard is to establish that the conduct/harassment was so severe or pervasive that it adversely affected the terms or conditions of the employee's employment. The adverse effect on the employee must be subjective, as well as objective. Not only must the employee suffer from the harassment, but it is also required that a reasonable person in the shoes of the employee would likely have suffered from such conduct. The latter is primarily a jury issue, if a minimum of bad conduct on the part of a co-worker or supervisor is established.

Certainly, repeated, unwanted touchings in the work place is sexual harassment. Repeated sexual jokes, if offensive, may also rise to the level of harassment.

With co-worker sexual harassment, the employer must be given an opportunity to stop the sexual harassment. This usually means that the employee is required to inform his or her manager or human resources of the offensive conduct in order for the employer to enjoy liability.

With sexual harassment by a supervisor, it gets a bit trickier. If the employer has a direct and appropriate policy and procedure to address sexual harassment by a supervisor, the employee should follow the process; otherwise, the employer may have an affirmative defense against the employee and abscond liability.

Of course, after an employee complains of sexual harassment, and the employer does nothing or, even worse, if the employer retaliates against the employee, then the employer incurs liability, including an additional claim of retaliation under Title VII.